By Mike Stone
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Biden administration wants to keep a controversial Trump policy that jump-started sales of armed drones to countries whose human rights records are under scrutiny in the United States and elsewhere, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
When former President Donald Trump’s administration reinterpreted the Cold War-era arms agreement between 35 nations known as the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) to increase drone sales, arms control advocates and some top Democratic lawmakers feared it would worsen global conflicts.
While it’s too early to tell if that is the case, sales have risen.
Keeping the policy could also be at odds with President Joe Biden’s campaign pledge to “make sure America does not check its values at the door to sell arms”. When Biden was vice president under President Barack Obama, human rights groups criticized their administration for armed drone attacks on Taliban militants in Afghanistan that also killed civilians.
From 2018 to 2020 Washington had been renegotiating the 33-year old MTCR to lift agreed-upon limits on the proliferation of drone technology. But last year Trump shelved an effort to rewrite the pact and decided to offer U.S. drones to nearly any country that wanted to buy them. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2EV1JW
Biden wants to renew those talks, the sources said.
While stealthy jets such as the $79 million F-35 grab headlines, drones are far less expensive but can still execute high-risk missile strikes and surveillance missions without endangering a pilot. Many of the U.S.-made aerial vehicles fly fast and carry big payloads, making them highly sought after while strengthening a country’s ties with the U.S. military.
The White House National Security Council (NSC) is studying how to keep the policy in place while the Department of State is asking allies and other countries that sell drones to adopt the U.S. position, people familiar with the matter said.
Though no decision has been passed up to the undersecretary cabinet level, people briefed on internal administration talks said it was leaning towards keeping Trump’s more expansive export policy.
“They are not going to walk it back,” one of the people said of the policy that Trump had hoped would take market share from Chinese-made drones.
An official at the NSC said, “the U.S. government will continue to invoke its national discretion” and treat large drones as though they fall outside the purview of the MTCR, which was written to control the proliferation of cruise missiles.
HOLDING DOOR OPEN
Keeping the policy holds the door open for hundreds of millions and eventually billions of dollars in U.S. sales to governments in Taiwan, India, Morocco, and the United Arab Emirates that in the past have been prohibited from buying them.
Human rights activists and arms control advocates are not the only skeptical voices about the Trump policy.
Members of Congress are holding up the sale of four drones to Morocco https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN28K2R4, reported by Reuters in December, over objections to the Trump administration’s move to recognize Western Sahara as Moroccan territory, people familiar with the deal told Reuters.
The NSC official said the decision to continue with the Trump policy “provides the U.S. government the flexibility to review UAS (unmanned aerial systems) export requests” while continuing to exercise that “national discretion in ways consistent with our MTCR commitments, as well as “our strong commitment to U.S. national security, human rights, nonproliferation, and other foreign policy objectives.”
The MTCR classifies several of the most powerful U.S. drones as cruise missiles because they meet the technical specifications for unpiloted aircraft in the pact.
Under Trump’s reinterpretation, the United States decided to treat large strike-capable drones that cannot travel faster than 800 kilometers per hour as though they belonged in a classification that fell outside the pact’s jurisdiction.
This allowed for easier export of Global Hawks, made by Northrop Grumman, which are not armed and used for surveillance, as well as Reapers used for both surveillance and air strikes and made by General Atomics.
Longer term, the Biden team wants to negotiate a whole new agreement just for drone exports, according to a source familiar with the situation and the NSC official.
The NSC official said the Biden team will “work with other countries to shape international standards for the sale, transfer, and subsequent use of armed UAS.”
(Reporting by Mike Stone in Washington; Editing by Chris Sanders and Grant McCool)
