By Michael Nienaber and David Lawder
LISBON (Reuters) – France, Germany and Italy said on Friday that a new U.S. proposal for global minimum corporate tax rate of at least 15% was a good basis for sealing an international deal by July.
The U.S. Treasury Department offered on Thursday to accept a minimum rate of at least 15%, significantly below its proposed 21% minimum for U.S. multinational firms.
It made the proposal at the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) where nearly 140 countries aim to reach broad agreement this summer to rework rules for taxing multinational groups and big technology companies, such as Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc.
“Treasury proposed to the steering group that the global minimum tax rate should be at least 15%,” the department said in a statement. “Treasury underscored that 15% is a floor and that discussions should continue to be ambitious and push that rate higher.”
U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen first proposed a 21% U.S. corporate minimum tax in April as part of President Joe Biden’s $2.2 trillion infrastructure spending proposal, which would be financed largely by increasing the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28%.
The Trump administration and congressional Republicans in 2017 cut the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%. At the same time, the Treasury launched a U.S. minimum tax, of 10.5%, known as the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income tax (GILTI) to capture revenue shifted by companies to tax-haven countries.
The Biden administration’s proposed 21% GILTI rate was widely viewed as a starting point for renewed OECD talks on a global minimum tax.
While France and Germany backed the 21%, other countries have pushed for a lower rate, as previous OECD discussions on the subject had centered around 12.5%, the same rate charged by Ireland.
“The last proposal made by the United States could be a good compromise,” French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said as he arrived for talks with euro zone counterparts in Lisbon.
His German counterpart Olaf Scholz welcomed the new U.S. proposal as “big progress” and EU Economics Commissioner Paolo Gentiloni said it was a step forward to a deal, as did Italian Economy Minister Daniele Franco.
All hoped that talks would be wrapped up as planned by a July meeting of G20 finance ministers, amid suggestions from the OECD that it could take until October to finalize a deal.
While Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe did not address the issue publicly in Lisbon, he reiterated in a pre-recorded interview for an online event his opposition to a “high” minimum tax and said September and October would be the key period for getting a deal.
Two euro zone officials at the meeting in Lisbon said that the U.S. offer would find wide backing in the broader European Union. “That 15% will be acceptable for all EU member states, including Luxembourg and Ireland,” one of the officials said.
Britain, which is due to host an online meeting of finance ministers next week, remains concerned that the latest U.S. proposals do not address the challenge of ensuring large multinationals, especially tech companies, pay more tax in countries where they generate revenue.
“MORE REALISTIC”
A U.S. Treasury official said the Biden administration will continue to advocate for the highest rate possible above 15%, adding that the offer does not alter the 21% proposed U.S. minimum tax.
The official said that even at 15%, the spread between U.S. and global minimum rates would narrow considerably, because there currently is no global minimum tax.
“The 15% rate is certainly more realistic given where other countries are,” said Manal Corwin, head of KPMG’s Washington National Tax practice and a former Treasury official.
“Importantly, this is signaling that the U.S. is willing to accept a global minimum tax that is well below the rate they are proposing for GILTI,” she added. “I suspect it was important for reaching agreement at the OECD that the U.S. is willing to agree to something well below 21%.”
The Treasury Department proposed the global minimum tax as a way to minimize the impact of a higher U.S. tax rate on the competitiveness of American companies and deter them from shifting operations or profits to lower-tax jurisdictions.
(Reporting by Michael Nienaber in Lisbon, David Lawder in Washington, additional reporting by Leigh Thomas in Paris, David Millikin in London, Padraic Halpin in Dublin and Jan Strupczewski in Brussels)
